Osprey Farpoint 40 vs Porter 46

The Osprey backpacks on this page Osprey Farpoint 40 vs Porter 46 is a comparison between two really good backpacks. But which one is the best choice for you? These sturdy nylon backpacks have a lot of similar features, so it’s understandable that you want to find more information about these bags before you spend your hard earned money on just one. But the differences between these two are very important and will certainly influence your purchasing decision. Read below to determine what you should get.

Osprey Farpoint 40 – Click here to check the price

Osprey 46 – Click here to check the price

Osprey Farpoint 40 VS Porter 46: Which of these backpacks is best for you …?

Construction

Osprey Frapoint 40 vs. Porter 46

Osprey Farpoint 40

Both Osprey backpacks are made from nylon, but while the Porter 46 is made from heavy-duty nylon, the Farpoint 40 is made from a lighter yet durable nylon blend. Osprey backpacks are considered some of the strongest backpacks of all time, and these two are no exception. The high build quality and the use of premium tear resistant materials make this a preferred choice among hikers, campers and other outdoor adventurers.

However, some users prefer the Porter 46 because it is made of a much thicker and stronger nylon material than the Farpoint 40. Despite their fears that the Farpoint 40 will not prove to be as durable as the Porter 46, it continued. to exceed their expectations and prove that their fears are false. Users of both say the Farpoint 40 is just as strong and durable as the Porter 46.

Equipment capacity, space and size

The Osprey Farpoint 40 is available in two sizes: S / M and M / L. The S / M is sized for those with a torso length of approximately 18 “and having a height of less than 5’6”. The M / L is best suited for people over 5’6 “with a length of torso greater than 18 “.

The Osprey Farpoint 40 has a capacity of 38L for the S / M waist pack and 40L for the M / L waist pack. The Osprey Porter 46 is available in one size with an impressive 46L capacity.

Invariably, the Porter 46 has a lot more space and depth than the Farpoint 40.

Colors

Both backpacks have three different color options. The Farpoint 40 can be found in red (Jasper Red), gray (Volcanic Gray) or blue (Persian Blue). The Porter 46 can be black, green (Nitro Green) or red (Voodoo Red).

Cabin baggage compliance

Both bags meet the carry-on baggage requirements of most airlines and therefore meet carry-on baggage standards. Most users claim that when packed to the hilt, both backpacks are still certified as a carry-on size, even on airlines with strict baggage restrictions.

Padding and comfort

Osprey 46

Osprey 46

These two Osprey backpacks come with chest (or sternum) straps, shoulder straps and hip straps or hip belts. Chest straps help with stability, shoulder straps help adjust the tension on your shoulders while hip straps help transfer and distribute weight from your shoulders to your hips.

While the Porter 46 excels in equipment capacity and space, it falls short of the Farpoint 40 when it comes to comfort. The Porter 46’s shoulder straps are sparsely padded and are more prone to dig into your shoulders, causing an uncomfortable rubbing sensation after long periods of time. Her hip belt is no different as the general consensus is that it doesn’t do an efficient job of distributing the weight of the bag properly. Some users have even claimed that their Porter 46 backpacks only come with attachment points for the shoulder straps and not the shoulder straps themselves.

Click here for more details on the Osprey Farpoint 40

Click here for more details on the Osprey Porter 46

The Farpoint 40 comes with well-padded shoulder straps, an efficient hip belt, and even a back panel with mesh cover to help with ventilation. At list price, the Farpoint 40 is more expensive than the Porter 46. Still, most users would agree with me when I say that for a backpack defined by comfort, the extra dollar is worth it (a sale may do the opposite depending on when you actually buy).

Compartments and security

Opening the Osprey Farpoint 40 will reveal a main compartment, laptop and tablet pockets, and a zippered pocket. It also has two exterior mesh pockets that can double as a water bottle holder and a zippered pocket at the top of the bag to store items you might want to access quickly. The main compartment has a large access panel which can be zipped and locked to secure the contents of the bag. While this bag’s security feature was praised, its lack of smaller compartments to help organize personal belongings was seriously condemned, with most users wanting the only internal pocket to have been split into two or three sous. -pockets. Some customers have claimed that when packed to the hilt, it becomes impossible to put water bottles in the bag’s exterior mesh pockets.

Like the Farpoint 40, the Porter 46 has the main compartment, zippered access panel, and laptop and tablet pockets. But that’s where the similarities end. The Porter 46 has two internal pockets for easy organization when packing. It has no exterior mesh pockets for water bottles and no easy access top pocket. The outer top pocket is found in the older Porter 46 model.

Several users report that they are not comfortable with the placement of the laptop and tablet sleeves in the front of the bag. If they were placed in the back, electronic devices would be better protected and would even help to distribute the weight of the bag.

Limits of use

The Porter 46 is more of a travel bag than a backpack. Simply put, it’s not meant to be worn on your back for more than an hour due to its barely there padding. The Farpoint 40, on the other hand, is a backpack that can be used for both travel and hiking. However, it is not a good choice for long hikes of more than 5 hours.

Convenient Features

Both bags have some very practical features that help improve the user experience. They both have sturdy, well-padded carrying handles that help carry the bag from point to point if you don’t want to carry it on your back. The shoulder straps, chest and hips can be stowed away in a back panel to give your bag a slimmer profile. There are whistles in their chest straps for emergency situations. Internal compression straps ensure your stuff doesn’t move around in the bag once you’re on the move. Just like your normal travel suitcases, these bags are designed as front loaders. This style of loading is infinitely preferable because it allows you to quickly access the contents of the bag when you need them.

The Porter 46 has an additional attachment point for backpacks, as well as foam reinforced walls to prevent sagging and give the bag a clean look.

Durability and guarantee

Both bags are tear resistant and their zippers rarely snap or snag. However, if during use the bag develops a tear or defect, Osprey gives you a lifetime warranty. This guarantee simply means that you can return the damaged bag to the nearest store and get a new one instantly without paying a dime. If that’s not an incentive to buy these bags, I don’t know what is.

Pros and Cons of the Osprey Farpoint 40

Advantages

  • Well padded
  • Comfortable
  • Sustainable
  • Lifetime warranty
  • Slightly water resistant
  • External front pockets for easy access

The inconvenients

  • Slightly heavier due to its padding
  • Less capacity and space than the Porter 46
  • Rain covers must be purchased separately
  • The pockets are not well compartmentalized to facilitate organization

Pros and Cons of the Osprey Porter 46

Advantages

  • Larger capacity and more space than the Farpoint 40
  • The pockets are well divided for easy organization
  • Sustainable
  • Lifetime warranty
  • Slightly water resistant

The inconvenients

  • Minimum padding
  • Not comfortable when worn for over an hour
  • Rain covers must be purchased separately
  • No external front pockets for easy access

Osprey Farpoint 40 – Click here to check ratings and reviews

Osprey 46 – Click here to check ratings and reviews

Summary and recommendation

The Osprey Farpoint 40 vs Porter 46 comparison comes down to capacity versus comfort. Although these two backpacks are well designed with a lot of practical and well thought out features, what separates them is very important.

According to customer reports and available design information, the Farpoint 40, with its more padded shoulder straps, is the more comfortable of the two backpacks. If I chose, I would go for the Farpoint 40 because, well, comfort takes precedence over capacity. And you can still put a lot of gear in the 40.

Leave a Comment